Relationship among language thought and utterance sentence

Sentence,utterances and propositions | zainab naqvi -

relationship among language thought and utterance sentence

language, we need to distinguish various aspects of a communicative A sentence is the grammatical object that each utterance corresponds to. And this meaning is purely linguistic. This can be In logical terms, this thought is called a PROPOSITION. Lexical semantics explicates the relationship between words and. A sentence is a string of words put together by the grammatical of rules of a language expressing a complete thought. It is neither physical event nor a physical. May 15, So it is something good speech in the form of words, sentences, ideas The relationship of language, thought, and utterance that is in the use.

Francois Grosjean as cited in Flora, expressing similar argument however argues that thoughts can be visual-spatial and non-linguistic thus the effect of language comes into effect the moment the individual intends to speak. Emphasizing the importance of being multilingual, Flora points out that monolinguals are underutilizing their abilities. Another aspect expressed by Flora quoting a study done in Canada is that bilingual brains are healthier as they delay the onset of dementia four years on average, enhances attention, and cognitive control in children and adults and enhances the ability to learn other languages.

Bilinguals are better at more divergent thinking for example in processing unrelated concepts and bilingual children are better able to process language at a fundamental metalinguistic level as compared to their monolingual peers Flora, Does it mean Tzeltal-speaking individuals do not understand the concepts of left and right or that those tribes in the Amazon do not understand there is more than two?

Research indicates thought can exist without language. Further evidence that language can exist before language is the magical shows by Renee Baillargeon whose stunts that defied fundamental principles of numbers resulted to young babies who had not yet acquired language to stare at those scenes more than when they stared at physically plausible ones.


Another example of existence of thought without language is in the study by Susan Goldin-Meadow on deaf children. Mental images are further provided as examples of thoughts without language. In addition, psychological studies have shown evidence of visual thinking where people can mentally manipulate images, rotate them etc. Conclusion[ edit ] The relationship between language and thought has been a subject of debate for many years.

The empirical evidence presented suggests that language shapes thinking putting to task the previously held theories on language universalism. Through a review of literature, the conclusion is that language and thought have interactive relationship in that language dictates thought whereas thought also influences language. Further conclusions include; language organizes thought, people with different cultures and languages think differently, multilingual individuals have broader thinking as compared to monolinguals, and that thought can exist without language.

Present research in this are however is not exhaustive and thus the need for further research especially one that utilizes the new technologies in brain neurology.

References[ edit ] Andrew, R. The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Key to intelligence questioned. How does our language shape the way we think? Gorgias, sophist and artist. Can an insect speak? The case of the honeybee dance language. Social Studies of Science, 34 1 The relationship between thought and reality in cognitive semantics.

Psycholinguistics/Language and Thought - Wikiversity

Does Language dictate the way we think? How language shapes thought. Scientific America, 2 One individual, two identities: Frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, The Language of Thinking. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 5: Relationship between language and thought from a cross-cultural perspective. The Columbia Encyclopedia 6th ed.

The Cambridge handbook of consciousness. Learning Exercise[ edit ] After reviewing the chapter, please read the following, paying attention to the questions: Language and thought as discussed in the chapter designates essentially, a distinctive element of human knowledge and communication, complex and mysterious in nature that closely embraces concomitance.

Every theory was cognizant of the utility of language despite its complexity. Sapir and Whorf, Rene Descartes, Bertrand Russell, Noam Chomsky, Wittgenstein, Frege Gottlob, Lev Vygotsky and many other scholars for instance, were confronted with the same paradigm of language-thought relationship, bringing forward different opinions not because of their difference in language that determined each ones thought process, but due to the universality of the objects of thought.

In understanding the relationship between language and thought, I have used the following analogy to support a number of questions presented. A professor of philosophy flew to Brazil for a holiday period. During his time in Brazil, he was caught by the Brazilian authorities drunk and disorderly in public and was arrested. My clothes died too and the wristwatch I had. Using his words, a person might say that the man is insane without subscribing him even for a medical test.

relationship among language thought and utterance sentence

However, in reality and despite his language, is the professor unintelligent? To what extent then can language depict in reality the thought ability and process of another?. Do animals not communicate? Moreover, if they do, how do they? We all agree that animals are irrational beings. If then language dictates or has a relationship with our thought process, how does it relate with the irrationality of the animals?

When a dog barks at night, it communicates to the owner that a stranger may be around. Two possible contexts for using an utterance based on the sentence in A will be considered. They lead to different explicatures. Firstly, Ann sends a text message to Bess: Secondly, Charley says to the driver of a bus about to pull out of a busy terminus: These explicatures of utterances go beyond the literal meaning of the sentence That was the last bus.

Background knowledge comes in too buses generally stop running at some late hour; Bess knows where Ann was going and takes it that Ann knows that she knows.

Since context has to be considered, this is pragmatics. As with other pragmatic interpretations, there are uncertainties over explicature, which is why we used the word probably in both of the previous paragraphs. These are inferences derived by trying to understand, in the light of contextual and background information, the point of a sender producing utterances that, in context, are likely to have particular explicatures.

So utterance meaning is a necessary fiction that linguists doing semantics and pragmatics have to work with. It is the meaning — explicature and implicatures — that an utterance would likely be understood as conveying when interpreted by people who know the language, are aware of the context, and have whatever background knowledge the sender could reasonably presume to be available to the addressee s. Utterances are the data for linguistics, so linguists,when, interested in meaning want to explain utterance meaning.

When utterance is based upon sentence then we must peep into the concept of sentence…. A sentence is neither a physical event nor a physical object. It is, conceived abstractly, a string of words put together by the grammatical rules of a language. A sentence can be thought of as the ideal string of words behind various realizations in utterances and inscriptions. We have defined a sentence as a string of words.

A given sentence always consists of the same words, and in the same order. Any change in the words, or in their order, makes a different sentence, for our purposes.

relationship among language thought and utterance sentence

Accent and voice quality belong strictly to the utterance, not to the sentence uttered. Not all utterances are actually tokens of sentences, but sometimes only of parts of sentences, e. A sentence is a grammatically complete string of words expressing a complete thought.

Psycholinguistics/Language and Thought

This very traditional definition is unfortunately vague, but it is hard to arrive at a better one for our purposes. It is intended to exclude any string of words that does not have a verb in it, as well as other strings. The idea is best shown by examples. From the figure above the following can be drawn: A sentence is a statement of a proposition and a representation of event through the proposition whereas a proposition is what a sentence statement describes and a view of event.

Therefore, we have a sequence as follows: The Five Types of Sentence Meaning a Proposition meaning b Connotative meaning c Cultural meaning d Structural meaning including grammatical meaning and collocative meaning e Pragmatic meaning. Does John get up late? John does not get up late. The above three sentences, though different in forms one is a statement, one an interrogation, and one a negationhave the same proposition: John gets up late. Aj tum ghr saf kro gi. The English sentence above has a connotation of derogatory sense while the urdu one has a connotation of commendatory sense.

Her heart is like a well with 15 buckets of which 7 come up and 8 go down. She felt extremely uneasy and restless. A simple sentence, also called an independent clause, contains a subject and a verb, and it expresses a complete thought.


Some students like to study in the mornings. A compound sentence contains two independent clauses joined by a coordinator. An important topical division is between the study of language structure grammar and the study of meaning semantics and pragmatics. Grammar encompasses morphology the formation and composition of wordssyntax the rules that determine how words combine into phrases andsentences and phonology the study of sound systems and abstract sound units.

relationship among language thought and utterance sentence

Semantics is also a component of linguistics of the samekind as grammar. It encompasses the meaning of words, sentences, and utterances; pragmatics studies the way in which context contributes to meaning of the speaker.

relationship among language thought and utterance sentence

In this paper, we will discuss about basic ideas of semantics such as sentence, utterance, and proposition. We are studying what is known as semantics: It is often used inordinary language to denote a problem of understanding that comes down to word selection orconnotation. This problem of understanding has been the subject of many formal inquiries, over a long period of time, most notably in the field of formal semantics.

In linguistics, it is the study of interpretation of signs or symbols as used by agents or communities within particular circumstances and contexts. Within this view, sounds, facial expressions, body language, have semantic meaningful content, and each has several branches of study. In written language, such things as paragraph, structure and punctuation have semantic content; in other forms of language, there is other semantic content.

The formal study of semantics intersects with many other fields of inquiry,including lexicon, syntax, pragmatics, etymology and others, although semantics is a well- defined field in its own right, 1 Harimurti, Kridalaksana.

Frege on Sense and Reference

Langkah Awal Memahami Linguistik. Inphilosophy of language, semantics and reference are related fields. Further related fields include philology, communication,and semiotics. The formal study of semantics is therefore complex. Semantics is sometimes contrasted with syntax, the study of the symbols of a language without reference to their meaningand pragmatics, the study of the relationships between the symbols of a language, their meaning, and the users of the language.

In linguistics, semantics is the subfield dealing with the study of meaning, as inherent at the levels of words, phrases, sentences, and larger units of discourse referred to as texts. The basic area of study is the meaning of signs, and the study of relations between different linguistic units: