UK interest rate rise in doubt as inflation stays at % | Business | The Guardian
Inflation is the rate of increase in prices over a given period of time. to a base year is the consumer price index (CPI), and the percentage change in the distort purchasing power over time for recipients and payers of fixed interest rates . This relationship between the money supply and the size of the economy is called. The Fed meets eight times a year to set short-term interest rate targets. During these meetings, the CPI and PPIs are significant factors in the Fed's decision. Learn how economic growth, inflation and interest rates link to the consumer price index and how the CPI, sometimes called the inflation index.
This has caused a spike in inflation, despite relatively weak economic growth. Cost-push inflationary factors have come from: This makes imports more expensive and has fed through into higher input prices for manufacturers.
Rise in petrol prices in early part of Rise in food and recreational goods. What factors are affecting current inflation rates? Despite temporary cost-push inflationary factors inunderlying inflationary pressures remain muted — at least compared to the past four decades.
The current UK inflation rate compares favourable to much of the post-war period.
This is due to: Fall in global inflation rates since Survey respondents keeping a diary of their purchases need to record only the total of purchases when itemised receipts were given to them and keep these receipts in a special pocket in the diary. These receipts provide not only a detailed breakdown of purchases but also the name of the outlet. Thus response burden is markedly reduced, accuracy is increased, product description is more specific and point of purchase data are obtained, facilitating the estimation of outlet-type weights.
There are only two general principles for the estimation of weights: Reweighing[ edit ] Ideally, in computing an index, the weights would represent current annual expenditure patterns. In practice they necessarily reflect past using the most recent data available or, if they are not of high quality, some average of the data for more than one previous year.
Some countries have used a three-year average in recognition of the fact that household survey estimates are of poor quality.
In some cases some of the data sources used may not be available annually, in which case some of the weights for lower level aggregates within higher level aggregates are based on older data than the higher level weights.
Infrequent reweighing saves costs for the national statistical office but delays the introduction into the index of new types of expenditure. For example, subscriptions for Internet service entered index compilation with a considerable time lag in some countries, and account could be taken of digital camera prices between re-weightings only by including some digital cameras in the same elementary aggregate as film cameras.
Owner-occupiers and the price index[ edit ] The way in which owner-occupied dwellings should be dealt with in a consumer price index has been, and remains, a subject of heated controversy in many countries. Various s have been considered, each with their advantages and disadvantages. Imputed rent Leaving aside the quality of public services, the environment, crime and so forth, and regarding the standard of living as a function of the level and composition of individuals' consumption, this standard depends upon the amount and range of goods and services they consume.
These include the service provided by rented accommodation, which can readily be priced, and the similar services yielded by a flat or house owned by the consumer who occupies it. Its cost to a consumer is, according to the economic way of thinking, an "opportunity cost", namely what he or she sacrifices by living in it.
This cost, according to many economists, is what should form a component of a consumer price index. Opportunity cost can be looked at in two ways, since there are two alternatives to continuing to live in an owner-occupied dwelling.
One — supposing that it is one year's cost that is to be considered — is to sell it, earn interest on the owner's capital thus released, and buy it back a year later, making an allowance for its physical depreciation. This can be called the "alternative cost" approach. The other, the "rental equivalent" approach, is to let it to someone else for the year, in which case the cost is the rent that could be obtained for it.
- Inflation: Prices on the Rise
- Google to appeal after EC fines it €4.34bn over Android competition breach - business live
- Related Resources
There are, of course, practical problems in implementing either of these economists' approaches. Thus, with the alternative cost approach, if house prices are rising fast the cost can be negative and then become sharply positive once house prices start to fall, so such an index would be very volatile.
On the other hand, with the rental equivalent approach, there may be difficulty in estimating the movement of rental values of types of property which are not actually rented. If one or other of these measures of the consumption of the services of owner-occupied dwellings is included in consumption, then it must be included in income too, for income equals consumption plus saving. This means that if the movement of incomes is to be compared with the movement of the consumer price index, incomes must be expressed as money income plus this imaginary consumption value.
That is logical, but it may not be what users of the index want. Although the argument has been expressed in connection with owner-occupied dwellings, the logic applies equally to all durable consumer goods and services. Furniture, carpets and domestic appliances are not used up soon after purchase in the way that food is.
Like dwellings, they yield a consumption service that can continue for years. Furthermore, since strict logic is to be adhered to, there are durable services as well that ought to be treated in the same way; the service consumers derive from appendectomies or crowned teeth continue for a long time. Since estimating values for these components of consumption has not been tackled, the economic theorists are torn between their desire for intellectual consistency and their recognition that inclusion of the opportunity cost of the use of durables is impracticable.
This turns out to be quite complicated, conceptually as well as in practice. To explain what is involved, consider a consumer price index computed with reference to for just one sole consumer who bought her house infinancing half of this sum by raising a mortgage.
The problem is to compare how much interest such a consumer would now be paying with the interest that was paid in It does not require an estimate of how much that identical person is paying now on the actual house she bought ineven though that is what personally concerns her now.
A consumer price index compares how much it would cost now to do exactly what consumers did in the reference-period with what it cost then. Application of the principle thus requires that the index for our one house owner should reflect the movement of the prices of houses like hers from to and the change in interest rates. If she took out a fixed-interest rate mortgage it is the change in interest rates from to that counts; if she took out a variable interest mortgage it is the change from to that counts.
Thus her current index with as reference-period will stand at more than if house prices or, in the case of a fixed-interest mortgage, interest rates rose between and The application of this principle in the owner-occupied dwellings component of a consumer price index is known as the "debt profile" method.
When real incomes are rising, so is the standard of living, and vice versa. In reality, prices change at different paces. In an inflationary environment, unevenly rising prices inevitably reduce the purchasing power of some consumers, and this erosion of real income is the single biggest cost of inflation.
Inflation can also distort purchasing power over time for recipients and payers of fixed interest rates. Take pensioners who receive a fixed 5 percent yearly increase to their pension.
To the extent that inflation is not factored into nominal interest rates, some gain and some lose purchasing power. Indeed, many countries have grappled with high inflation—and in some cases hyperinflation, 1, percent or higher inflation a year.
InZimbabwe experienced one of the worst cases of hyperinflation ever, with estimated annual inflation at one point of billion percent.
Inflation: Prices on the Rise - Back to Basics: Finance & Development
Such high levels of inflation have been disastrous, and countries have had to take difficult and painful policy measures to bring inflation back to reasonable levels, sometimes by giving up their national currency, as Zimbabwe has.
If rapidly rising prices are bad for the economy, is the opposite, or falling prices, good? It turns out that deflation is not desirable either.STOCK MARKET - CPI & INTEREST RATES
When prices are falling, consumers delay making purchases if they can, anticipating lower prices in the future. For the economy this means less economic activity, less income generated by producers, and lower economic growth.
Bonds, Interest Rates and the Impact of Inflation
Japan is one country with a long period of nearly no economic growth largely because of deflation. Preventing deflation during the recent global financial crisis is one of the reasons the U. Federal Reserve and other central banks around the world kept interest rates low for a prolonged period and have instituted other policy measures to ensure financial systems have plenty of liquidity. Most economists now believe that low, stable, and—most important—predictable inflation is good for an economy.
If inflation is low and predictable, it is easier to capture it in price-adjustment contracts and interest rates, reducing its distortionary impact. Moreover, knowing that prices will be slightly higher in the future gives consumers an incentive to make purchases sooner, which boosts economic activity.